Senator Adam Schiff Hails Federal Judge’s Order to End Trump’s “Misuse” of National Guard in Los Angeles

A federal judge reportedly ruled that President Donald Trump’s ongoing deployment of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles violates federal law, prompting Senator Adam Schiff to demand their immediate withdrawal.

The decision comes after months of legal challenges from state officials, who argued the roughly 100 remaining service members served no legitimate purpose following the initial emergency justification.

The deployment began in June 2025, when Trump invoked emergency powers to station thousands of Guard troops along California’s borders and urban centers. Officials cited rising illegal border crossings and localized unrest as reasons for the move, aiming to bolster federal immigration enforcement amid strained resources. California Governor Gavin Newsom quickly contested the federalization of state troops, claiming it stripped local control without congressional approval and diverted personnel from wildfire response and disaster aid.

Over the summer, the Guard’s role shifted from patrols to support operations, but critics pointed to idle units stationed in parking lots and warehouses as evidence of inefficiency. Taxpayer costs reportedly topped $150 million by fall, fueling bipartisan grumbles over diverted funds that could address infrastructure gaps or veteran programs. Legal filings highlighted instances where troops clashed with protesters during routine checks, raising concerns about escalation in diverse communities.

Reports indicate the judge’s order, issued by U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, stems from a lawsuit filed by California’s attorney general alleging overreach under the Posse Comitatus Act. Breyer reportedly described the continued presence as a “profoundly un-American” extension of executive power, effective December 15 unless appealed. This ruling aligns with prior court rebukes of similar federal-state troop disputes, though the White House has signaled plans to challenge it swiftly.

It is true that the judge ordered the deployment’s end, confirming Schiff’s statement on the troops’ return, though the administration disputes the “misuse” label and vows an appeal. Claims of abuse and waste hold merit based on documented costs and idle periods, but supporters argue the Guard deterred crossings effectively before the ruling. The partisan framing overlooks how initial deployments received mixed reviews from border security advocates, who noted temporary drops in encounters.

Media reporting for this story: 67% Left | 12% Right | 18% Center | 3% Unrated

Will the National Guard fully withdraw from Los Angeles by December 15, 2025? YES or NO

FYI, I add facts to stories that often miss them. Join our newsletter for updates on federal military deployments or become a reporter and report any federal military deployments developments yourself.