Military Attorneys Fear Hegseth’s Dismissal Power

Military attorneys have expressed concerns over potential changes under Pete Hegseth’s leadership at the Pentagon. Reports, including from Politico, indicate some officers fear the Trump appointee could push to alter legal priorities within the military. These worries emerged during his contentious Senate confirmation process, which concluded with his approval on January 24, 2025.

Confirmed as Secretary of Defense, Hegseth has pledged to eliminate what he calls “woke policies” from the military. Some within the ranks worry this could lead to the dismissal of attorneys who don’t align with his goals. Critics suggest such actions might challenge the independence of the military justice system, a framework long valued for its impartiality.

Hegseth’s outsider status as a former Fox News commentator and staunch Trump supporter has fueled debate. Past allegations of misconduct, including a 2017 sexual assault claim he denies and settled, as well as an affidavit from his ex-sister-in-law alleging abusive behavior toward his second wife—who denied physical abuse—intensified scrutiny during his confirmation. Some military lawyers question whether he might favor loyalty over expertise in reshaping Pentagon legal teams.

Pentagon legal teams oversee critical matters, from war crimes to troop discipline, guided by strict codes like the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Attorneys have voiced fears that significant personnel changes—like Hegseth’s recent firings of top Army, Navy, and Air Force lawyers—could replace experienced professionals with political allies, potentially undermining confidence in a system designed to ensure fairness amid conflict.

Hegseth’s supporters argue he’s tackling inefficiencies and realigning the military with Trump’s vision, dismissing critics as entrenched bureaucrats. During confirmation, some GOP senators sought clarity on his plans, though most ultimately backed him in a 51-50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie.

With U.S. forces active worldwide, legal rulings shape military conduct and national security. A leadership shift could influence cases tied to troop behavior or veteran rights, though claims of a “reckless gamble” reflect opponents’ views rather than current outcomes. Hegseth’s early moves, like reversing diversity policies, signal change, but the full impact remains unclear.

Confirmation hearings highlighted divisions over Hegseth’s readiness, with Democrats criticizing his lack of senior management experience. Some military attorneys reportedly urged lawmakers to protect their system’s autonomy during the process. His confirmation tests how far Trump’s unconventional picks can reshape established institutions.

Now leading 1.3 million active-duty troops and a vast legal apparatus, Hegseth holds significant influence. His recent actions, such as denying rumors of a broader officer “purge list,” suggest a focus on targeted shifts rather than mass upheaval. How he balances reform with stability could shape military accountability for years to come.