House GOP Blocks Vote to Curb Trump’s Tariff Powers

House Republican leaders have quietly embedded a provision in the latest budget proposal that prevents Congress from voting to reclaim tariff-setting authority from President Donald Trump, solidifying his control over trade policy as global tensions rise. This move, uncovered this week, has sparked outrage among Democrats and some GOP moderates who fear unchecked presidential power could destabilize the economy, especially as Trump’s sweeping tariffs—now at 104% on Chinese goods—threaten a deepening trade war.

The budget language was slipped in during late-night negotiations. It effectively shields Trump’s ability to impose tariffs without oversight.

Democrats accused the GOP of dodging accountability on a divisive issue. They argue that tariffs are driving up costs for American consumers and businesses.

Some Republicans privately express unease over the trade war’s impact. Yet, party loyalty has kept most from breaking ranks publicly.

Trump has hailed tariffs as a boon for U.S. manufacturing and revenue. He claims they’ve generated billions, though economists dispute the net benefits.

The move comes as China retaliates with an 84% tariff on U.S. goods. Global markets have shuddered, with stocks tumbling this week.

Critics say Congress ceding tariff powers weakens democratic checks. Historically, lawmakers have held sway over trade to balance executive actions.

The White House praised the GOP’s support as a win for Trump’s agenda. Advisors say it ensures swift responses to foreign trade threats.

Business leaders, like those in retail, warn of supply chain chaos. They’ve lobbied for relief as prices climb on everyday goods.

Democrats plan to challenge the provision in upcoming budget talks. They face an uphill battle with the GOP’s slim House majority.

Trade experts predict prolonged uncertainty for international partners. The U.S.’s trade reputation could suffer long-term damage, they warn.

This power grab reflects Trump’s broader push to centralize authority. It raises questions about Congress’s role in a polarized era.