Fox News Host Martha MacCallum Argues Military Members Must Obey All Orders Given by Commanders

---

Full Story

Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum stated that members of the United States military accept an obligation to execute any mission assigned to them when they enlist. She explained that the only alternatives for service members who object to an order are to never join the armed forces or to resign if they later find an order unacceptable. MacCallum emphasized that following the chain of command forms a core part of military service.

Military law has long required personnel to obey lawful orders from superiors. Refusal to follow a lawful directive can lead to court-martial charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

MEDIA REPORTING

See how news sources on all sides are covering this story.

Left 21% | Right 48% | Center 24% | Unrated 6%

The Context

The principle of command authority traces back to the founding of the American armed forces. It ensures unified action during operations and maintains discipline across ranks.

Service members take an oath to obey the orders of the President and officers appointed over them. This oath underscores the hierarchical structure essential to military effectiveness.

Illegal orders, however, fall outside the duty to obey under established legal precedents. Troops have both the right and the responsibility to disobey directives that violate laws or the Constitution.

Historical cases like My Lai during the Vietnam War highlighted the consequences of following unlawful commands. Courts later convicted soldiers who claimed they were only following orders in clear war crimes.

Training programs now stress recognition of illegal orders to prevent repeats of past tragedies. Service members receive instruction on when refusal becomes a legal and moral duty.

Debates continue over where exactly the line between lawful and unlawful falls in complex situations. Clear violations such as targeting civilians remain undisputed as illegal under any circumstance.