DOJ Reviews Biden’s Last-Minute Pardons, Former U.S. Attorney Says

---

Full Story

The Department of Justice is reportedly examining several pardons issued by former President Joe Biden in his final days in office, according to former U.S. Attorney Ed Martin. The review raises questions about the legality and intent of these executive actions. Such scrutiny is rare but not unprecedented in transitions of power.

Presidential pardons are a constitutional power, often used to correct judicial errors. However, last-minute pardons can spark controversy over potential abuse.

MEDIA REPORTING

See how news sources on all sides are covering this story.

Left 29% | Right 41% | Center 24% | Unrated 6%

The Context

The DOJ’s review, as reported, focuses on unspecified Biden pardons. No details on the number or recipients of these pardons were disclosed.

Historically, presidents like Bill Clinton faced backlash for controversial pardons. Scrutiny often centers on whether pardons serve justice or political interests.

Some support broad pardon powers as a check on judicial overreach. Others argue they can undermine accountability if used for personal or political gain.

The Constitution grants presidents near-unlimited pardon authority, except in impeachment cases. Reviews like the DOJ’s typically assess procedural compliance.

Concerns about Biden’s pardons may reflect distrust in their timing. Supporters might view them as acts of mercy within presidential prerogative.

The DOJ’s findings could influence public perception of Biden’s legacy. However, legal challenges to pardons rarely succeed due to their broad authority.