AG Pam Bondi Directs FBI to Catalog Potential “Extremists” Among U.S. Citizens in Leaked Order

Attorney General Pam Bondi has reportedly instructed the FBI to build a database of Americans flagged as possible extremists, according to a confidential memo that surfaced this week.

The directive, which emphasizes rapid identification of threats, arrives amid heightened scrutiny over federal surveillance practices in the wake of recent policy shifts.

This order stems from broader efforts to strengthen domestic security, building on National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 signed earlier this year by President Trump.

That memo expanded definitions of extremism to include certain protest activities and migration-related dissent, aiming to link them with potential terrorism risks.

Critics argue it risks overreach by pulling in everyday citizens engaged in lawful advocacy, while supporters see it as a necessary update to outdated threat assessments.

Federal agencies have long maintained watchlists for violent actors, but this push reportedly prioritizes proactive data collection across social media and public records.

The leaked document, dated late November, calls for the list to feed into existing FBI systems for real-time monitoring and interagency sharing.

Pam Bondi, a Trump appointee with a background in Florida prosecution, has championed tough-on-crime measures since taking office.

Her tenure has seen increased funding for counter-extremism units, though details on implementation remain closely guarded.

Reports indicate the memo aligns with NSPM-7’s framework, which reclassifies some nonprofit involvement in border issues as indicators of radicalization.

It is reportedly accurate that Bondi signed the order, as confirmed by the leaked memo obtained by investigative journalist Ken Klippenstein, whose reporting has previously exposed similar classified directives.

While the term “extremists” is not newly defined here, its application to a broad American population raises concerns about vague criteria, though officials maintain it targets only credible risks.

No immediate violations of civil liberties laws are evident from the document itself, but advocacy groups warn it could echo past overreaches like post-9/11 profiling.

Media reporting for this story: 42% Left | 28% Right | 23% Center | 7% Unrated

FYI, I add facts to stories that often miss them. Join our newsletter for updates on government surveillance or become a reporter and report any government surveillance developments yourself.