Nepal Ends Social Media Ban After Deadly Protests

Nepal’s government has decided to end its recent ban on social media platforms following widespread demonstrations that turned violent across the country. The move comes as officials face mounting pressure from young protesters who took to the streets to voice their anger over the restrictions.

The ban, which affected around 26 platforms including Signal, Facebook, X, and WhatsApp, was put in place last week. Authorities claimed it was necessary because these companies had not registered properly and were allowing misuse of their services.

Protests erupted mainly in Kathmandu, the capital city, where thousands of mostly young people gathered to demand the ban be lifted. Demonstrators argued that the restrictions were an attempt to silence criticism of the government amid ongoing issues like corruption and economic inequality.

Clashes between protesters and police quickly escalated over the weekend. Security forces used tear gas and batons to disperse crowds, and in some instances, opened fire on demonstrators.

At least 19 people lost their lives in the violence, according to official reports. Over 400 others sustained injuries, many requiring hospital treatment for wounds from rubber bullets or live ammunition.

Human rights groups have condemned the government’s response to the protests. They called for investigations into the use of excessive force by law enforcement during the unrest.

Late on Monday, the cabinet announced the lifting of the ban in a statement from the communications ministry. Officials said platforms would now be allowed to operate while discussions continue on regulatory compliance.

Youth leaders who organized the protests welcomed the decision but vowed to keep pushing for broader reforms. They pointed out that the ban highlighted deeper problems with freedom of expression in Nepal.

International observers, including the United Nations, expressed concern over the deaths and injuries. The UN offered assistance to Nepal in addressing the aftermath and promoting dialogue between the government and citizens.

Analysts note that this episode reflects growing frustration among Nepal’s younger generation. Many feel disconnected from traditional politics and rely on social media for information and organizing.

The government has defended its initial ban as a measure to curb misinformation and harmful content. However, critics argue it was a pretext to control narratives during a time of political tension.

As services resume, users in Nepal are expected to regain access gradually over the next few days. The incident has sparked debates on balancing online regulation with civil liberties in the region.